On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 01:06:46AM +0300, Vladimir Oltean wrote: [...] > --- > The API for this one was chosen to be different than the one for > .port_vlan_add and .port_vlan_prepare because > (a) the list of dsa_switch_ops is growing bigger but in this case there > is no justification for it. For example there are some drivers that > don't do anything in .port_vlan_prepare, and likewise, they may not > need to do anything in .port_vlan_filtering_prepare either > (b) the DSA API should be as close as possible to the switchdev API > except when there's a strong reason for that not to be the case. In > this situation, I don't see why it would be different.
I understand that this new function prototype is not to everyone's taste?
