On Fri, 02 Oct 2020 17:04:11 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote: > > > Yeah, that'd work. I'd probably wonder if we shouldn't do > > > > > > [OP_POLICY] > > > [OP] -> (u32, u32) > > > > > > in a struct with two u32's, since that's quite a bit more compact. > > > > What do we do if the op doesn't have a dump or do callback? > > 0 is a valid policy ID, sadly :( > > Hm, good point. We could do -1 since that can't ever be reached though. > > But compactness isn't really that necessary here anyway, so ...
Cool, sounds like a plan. This series should be good to merge, then.