On Fri, 02 Oct 2020 17:04:11 +0200 Johannes Berg wrote:
> > > Yeah, that'd work. I'd probably wonder if we shouldn't do
> > > 
> > > [OP_POLICY]
> > >   [OP] -> (u32, u32)
> > > 
> > > in a struct with two u32's, since that's quite a bit more compact.  
> > 
> > What do we do if the op doesn't have a dump or do callback?
> > 0 is a valid policy ID, sadly :(  
> 
> Hm, good point. We could do -1 since that can't ever be reached though.
> 
> But compactness isn't really that necessary here anyway, so ...

Cool, sounds like a plan.

This series should be good to merge, then.

Reply via email to