Hi again On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 14:43:43 +0100, Patrick McHardy wrote > Denys wrote: > >>>Another thing, it is working well > >>>with old tc. Just really if i have plenty of RAM's and i want 32second > >>>buffer, why i cannot have that, and if i see it is really possible before? > >> > >>I know it worked before. But I can't think of a reason why anyone > >>would want a buffer that large. Why do you want to queue packets > >>for up to 64 seconds? > > > > Seems i misunderstand how it works. If i am not wrong, till buffer available, > > bandwidth will be given on "peakrate" speed, and when buffer is empty - on > > "rate" speed. I am wrong? > > No, I got confused, sorry about that. Your configuration allows > bursts up to 64 seconds long. I guess there's nothing wrong with that. > > I already asked Stephen to revert that patch, it was not meant to > be included yet, unfortunately it made it into the release. Even > more unfortunate is that it looks like we need larger types in the > ABI to properly support nano-second resolution.
Thanks sir for your great help and great software and sorry that i took time, by not enough good explanation. -- Virtual ISP S.A.L. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
