Hi again Looks like everything is fine, i will deploy at few NAS today night and will see if there any issues. Both oops what i gave, is it related to this bug? No need to dig anything else?
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 17:10:36 +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote > Denys wrote: > > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [ 551.481081] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL > > pointer dereference > > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 at virtual address 00000074 > > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [ 551.481187] printing eip: > > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [ 551.481236] f8a11df1 > > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [ 551.481289] *pde = 00000000 > > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [ 551.481340] Oops: 0000 [#1] > > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [ 551.481384] > > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 SMP > > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 > > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [ 551.481549] Modules linked in: > > .... long module list > > ar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [ 551.485237] CPU: 0 > > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [ 551.485238] EIP: 0060:[<f8a11df1>] Not > > tainted VLI > > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [ 551.485239] EFLAGS: 00010282 (2.6.20.3- build- > > 0001 #4) > > Mar 26 21:20:04 ROUTER-75 [ 551.485438] EIP is at htb_qlen_notify+0x9/ 0x79 > > [sch_htb] > > Oops, that seems to be my fault. Can you please try the attached patch? > To reproduce the problem you need to have packets queued while the > device is going down, so please make sure that is true by flooding > the device or something like that. -- Virtual ISP S.A.L. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
