On 6/22/20 5:05 AM, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote: > On Fri Jun 19 2020, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote: >> On Thu Jun 18 2020, Florian Fainelli wrote: >>> On 6/17/2020 11:40 PM, Kurt Kanzenbach wrote: >>>> Add basic documentation and example. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Kurt Kanzenbach <k...@linutronix.de> >>>> --- >>>> .../devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hellcreek.txt | 72 +++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+) >>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hellcreek.txt >>>> >>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hellcreek.txt >>>> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hellcreek.txt >>>> new file mode 100644 >>>> index 000000000000..9ea6494dc554 >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/dsa/hellcreek.txt >>> >>> This should be a YAML binding and we should also convert the DSA binding >>> to YAML one day. >> >> OK. > > I converted it into a YAML binding. Should I provide the dsa.yaml as > well? Otherwise I have to define the DSA properties such as dsa,member > in the hellcreek.yaml file.
If you have the generic DSA binding converted as YAML that would be highly welcome you can submit that separately from your patch series. There are quite a few Device Tree sources in tree that can be used as a validation vector for dsa.yaml. -- Florian
