Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakry...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 12:10 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@redhat.com>
> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > +struct bpf_map_def {
>> > + unsigned int type;
>> > + unsigned int key_size;
>> > + unsigned int value_size;
>> > + unsigned int max_entries;
>> > + unsigned int map_flags;
>> > + unsigned int inner_map_idx;
>> > + unsigned int numa_node;
>> > +};
>>
>> Didn't we agree on no new bpf_map_def ABI in libbpf, and that all
>> additions should be BTF-based?
>
> Oh yes, we did, sorry, this is an oversight. I really appreciate you
> pointing this out ;)
> I'll go over bpf_helpers.h carefully and will double-check if we don't
> have any other custom selftests-only stuff left there.
Great, thanks!
-Toke
