On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 12:10 AM Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <t...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
> > +struct bpf_map_def {
> > + unsigned int type;
> > + unsigned int key_size;
> > + unsigned int value_size;
> > + unsigned int max_entries;
> > + unsigned int map_flags;
> > + unsigned int inner_map_idx;
> > + unsigned int numa_node;
> > +};
>
> Didn't we agree on no new bpf_map_def ABI in libbpf, and that all
> additions should be BTF-based?
Oh yes, we did, sorry, this is an oversight. I really appreciate you
pointing this out ;)
I'll go over bpf_helpers.h carefully and will double-check if we don't
have any other custom selftests-only stuff left there.
>
> -Toke
>
