Thanks for the link - that's really useful. I did re-order ip rules Friday (I think) - no change
-----Original Message----- From: David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> Sent: 10 September 2019 17:36 To: Alexis Bauvin <abau...@online.net>; Gowen <go...@potatocomputing.co.uk> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: VRF Issue Since kernel 5 On 9/9/19 1:01 PM, Alexis Bauvin wrote: > Could you try swapping the local and l3mdev rules? > > `ip rule del pref 0; ip rule add from all lookup local pref 1001` yes, the rules should be re-ordered so that local rule is after l3mdev rule (VRF is implemented as policy routing). In general, I would reverse the order of those commands to ensure no breakage. Also, 5.0 I think it was (too many kernel versions) added a new l3mdev sysctl (raw_l3mdev_accept). Check all 3 of them and nmake sure they are set properly for your use case. These slides do not cover 5.0 changes but are still the best collection of notes on VRF: http://schd.ws/hosted_files/ossna2017/fe/vrf-tutorial-oss.pdf