Hi all, On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 11:52 -0400, Willem de Bruijn wrote: > This clearly has some loose ends and is no shorter or simpler. So > unless anyone has comments or a different solution, I'll finish > up the first variant.
I'm sorry for the late feedback. I was wondering if we could use a new UDP-specific setsockopt to remove the connected socket from the reuseport group at connect() time? That would not have any behavioral change for existing application leveraging the current reuseport implementation and requires possibly a simpler implementation, but would need application changes for UDP servers doing reuse/connect(). WDYT? Cheers, Paolo
