> -----Original Message-----
> From: Li Yang [mailto:leoyang...@nxp.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 February, 2019 12:07 AM
> To: Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.ban...@nxp.com>
> Cc: Shawn Guo <shawn...@kernel.org>; Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch>;
> Florian Fainelli <f.faine...@gmail.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> ker...@lists.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: lx2160aqds: Add mdio mux nodes
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 2:53 AM Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.ban...@nxp.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > The two external MDIO buses used to communicate with phy devices that
> > are external to SOC are muxed in LX2160AQDS board.
> >
> > These buses can be routed to any one of the eight IO slots on
> > LX2160AQDS board depending on value in fpga register 0x54.
> >
> > Additionally the external MDIO1 is used to communicate to the onboard
> > RGMII phy devices.
> >
> > The mdio1 is controlled by bits 4-7 of fpga register and mdio2 is
> > controlled by bits 0-3 of fpga register.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.ban...@nxp.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> > V2:
> > - removed unnecassary TODO statements
> > - removed device_type from mdio nodes
> > - change the case of hex number to lowercase
> > - removed board specific comments from soc file
>
> There are still some comments from V1 haven't been addressed.
>
> >
> > .../boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-qds.dts | 115 +++++++++++++++++
> > .../boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi | 18 +++
> > 2 files changed, 133 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-qds.dts
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-qds.dts
> > index 99a22abbe725..2c3020a72d41 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-qds.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a-qds.dts
> > @@ -46,6 +46,121 @@
> > &i2c0 {
> > status = "okay";
> >
> > + fpga@66 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,lx2160aqds-fpga", "fsl,fpga-qixis-i2c";
> > + reg = <0x66>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + mdio-mux-1@54 {
>
> Still no compatible string defined for the node. Probably should be
> "mdio-mux-
> mmioreg", "mdio-mux"
it is not a specific device. MDIO mux is meant to be controlled by some
registers of parent device (FPGA).
Therefore, IMO this should not be a device and there should not be any
"compatible" property for it.
>
> > + mdio-parent-bus = <&emdio1>;
> > + reg = <0x54>; /* BRDCFG4 */
> > + mux-mask = <0xf8>; /* EMI1_MDIO */
> > + #address-cells=<1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + mdio@0 {
> > + reg = <0x00>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@40 {
> > + reg = <0x40>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@c0 {
> > + reg = <0xc0>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@c8 {
> > + reg = <0xc8>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@d0 {
> > + reg = <0xd0>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@d8 {
> > + reg = <0xd8>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@e0 {
> > + reg = <0xe0>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@e8 {
> > + reg = <0xe8>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@f0 {
> > + reg = <0xf0>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@f8 {
> > + reg = <0xf8>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > + mdio-mux-2@54 {
> > + mdio-parent-bus = <&emdio2>;
> > + reg = <0x54>; /* BRDCFG4 */
> > + mux-mask = <0x07>; /* EMI2_MDIO */
> > + #address-cells=<1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > +
> > + mdio@0 {
> > + reg = <0x00>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@1 {
> > + reg = <0x01>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@2 {
> > + reg = <0x02>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@3 {
> > + reg = <0x03>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@4 {
> > + reg = <0x04>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@5 {
> > + reg = <0x05>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@6 {
> > + reg = <0x06>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + mdio@7 {
> > + reg = <0x07>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + };
> > + };
> > + };
> > +
> > i2c-mux@77 {
> > compatible = "nxp,pca9547";
> > reg = <0x77>;
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi
> > b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi
> > index a79f5c1ea56d..a74045ad22ad 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi
> > @@ -762,5 +762,23 @@
> > <GIC_SPI 209 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> > dma-coherent;
> > };
> > +
> > + /* WRIOP0: 0x8b8_0000, E-MDIO1: 0x1_6000 */
> > + emdio1: mdio@8b96000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,fman-memac-mdio";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x8b96000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + little-endian; /* force the driver in LE mode
> > + */
>
> Still doesn't fully align with the binding at
> "Documentation/devicetree/bindings/powerpc/fsl/fman.txt".
>
> It should either have the "interrupts" property for external MDIO or
> "fsl,fman-
> internal-mdio" for internal MDIO.
I see that for DPAA1 based SOCs, there was definitely an interrupt property in
external MDIO node.
BUT, for DPAA2 based devices none of the SOC has this property. I am looking
further into this.
>
> > + };
> > +
> > + /* WRIOP0: 0x8b8_0000, E-MDIO2: 0x1_7000 */
> > + emdio2: mdio@8b97000 {
> > + compatible = "fsl,fman-memac-mdio";
> > + reg = <0x0 0x8b97000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > + #address-cells = <1>;
> > + #size-cells = <0>;
> > + little-endian; /* force the driver in LE mode */
> > + };
> > };
> > };
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
