Hi, In net/ipv4/ip_options.c::ip_options_compile() we have the following code at the start of the function :
int ip_options_compile(struct ip_options * opt, struct sk_buff * skb) { int l; unsigned char * iph; unsigned char * optptr; int optlen; unsigned char * pp_ptr = NULL; struct rtable *rt = skb ? (struct rtable*)skb->dst : NULL; if (!opt) { opt = &(IPCB(skb)->opt); iph = skb->nh.raw; opt->optlen = ((struct iphdr *)iph)->ihl*4 - sizeof(struct iphdr); optptr = iph + sizeof(struct iphdr); opt->is_data = 0; } else { optptr = opt->is_data ? opt->__data : (unsigned char*)&(skb->nh.iph[1]); iph = optptr - sizeof(struct iphdr); } ... I don't see how that avoids blowing up if we get passed a NULL skb.
From the line
struct rtable *rt = skb ? (struct rtable*)skb->dst : NULL; it is clear that we /may/ get passed a null skb. Then a bit further down in the if (!opt) bit we dereference 'skb' : opt = &(IPCB(skb)->opt); and we also may dereference it in the else part : optptr = opt->is_data ? opt->__data : (unsigned char*)&(skb->nh.iph[1]); So if 'skb' is NULL, the only route I see that doesn't cause a NULL pointer deref is if (opt != NULL) and at the same time (opt->is_data != NULL) . Is that guaranteed in any way? If now, how come we don't blow up regularly? -- Jesper Juhl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html