On 11/21/2018 02:31 PM, Yuchung Cheng wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 9:52 AM, Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> wrote:

>> +
> Really nice! would it make sense to re-use (some of) the similar
> tcp_try_coalesce()?
>

Maybe, but it is a bit complex, since skbs in receive queues (regular or out of 
order)
are accounted differently (they have skb->destructor set)

Also they had the TCP header pulled already, while the backlog coalescing also 
has
to make sure TCP options match.

Not sure if we want to add extra parameters and conditional checks...


Reply via email to