On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 10:17 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:05 AM Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11/20/2018 06:13 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> > > Currently, we only dump a few selected skb fields in
> > > netdev_rx_csum_fault(). It is not suffient for debugging checksum
> > > fault. This patch introduces skb_dump() which dumps skb mac header,
> > > network header and its whole skb->data too.
> > >
> > > Cc: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au>
> > > Cc: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
> > > Cc: David Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
> > > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> >
> >
> > > +     print_hex_dump(level, "skb data: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1,
> > > +                    skb->data, skb->len, false);
> >
> > As I mentioned to David, we want all the bytes that were maybe already 
> > pulled
> >
> > (skb->head starting point, not skb->data)
>
> Hmm, with mac header and network header, it is effectively from skb->head, no?
> Is there anything between skb->head and mac header?

Oh, I guess we wanted a single hex dump, or we need some user program
to be able to
rebuild from different memory zones the original CHECKSUM_COMPLETE value.

>
> >
> > Also we will miss the trimmed bytes if there were padding data.
> > And it seems the various bugs we have are all tied to the pulled or trimmed 
> > bytes.
> >
>
> Unless I miss something, the tailing padding data should be in range
> [iphdr->tot_len, skb->len]. No?


Not after we did the pskb_trim_rcsum() call, since it has effectively
reduced skb->len by the number of padding bytes.

Reply via email to