On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 10:17 AM Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 5:05 AM Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 11/20/2018 06:13 PM, Cong Wang wrote: > > > Currently, we only dump a few selected skb fields in > > > netdev_rx_csum_fault(). It is not suffient for debugging checksum > > > fault. This patch introduces skb_dump() which dumps skb mac header, > > > network header and its whole skb->data too. > > > > > > Cc: Herbert Xu <herb...@gondor.apana.org.au> > > > Cc: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com> > > > Cc: David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> > > > Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> > > > --- > > > > > > > + print_hex_dump(level, "skb data: ", DUMP_PREFIX_OFFSET, 16, 1, > > > + skb->data, skb->len, false); > > > > As I mentioned to David, we want all the bytes that were maybe already > > pulled > > > > (skb->head starting point, not skb->data) > > Hmm, with mac header and network header, it is effectively from skb->head, no? > Is there anything between skb->head and mac header?
Oh, I guess we wanted a single hex dump, or we need some user program to be able to rebuild from different memory zones the original CHECKSUM_COMPLETE value. > > > > > Also we will miss the trimmed bytes if there were padding data. > > And it seems the various bugs we have are all tied to the pulled or trimmed > > bytes. > > > > Unless I miss something, the tailing padding data should be in range > [iphdr->tot_len, skb->len]. No? Not after we did the pskb_trim_rcsum() call, since it has effectively reduced skb->len by the number of padding bytes.