> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 2:17 PM > To: Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> > Cc: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; > intel-wired- > l...@lists.osuosl.org > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for extended PHC gettime > > On Wed, Oct 31, 2018 at 03:49:35PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > > > How about separating the PHC timestamp from the ptp_system_timestamp > > structure and use NULL to indicate we don't want to read the system > > clock? A gettimex64(ptp, ts, NULL) call would be equal to > > gettime64(ptp, ts). > > Doesn't sound too bad to me. > > Thanks, > Richard Yep, this seems fine to me as well. Regards, Jake
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] igb: add support for extended PH... Richard Cochran
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] igb: add support for extende... Miroslav Lichvar
- RE: [RFC PATCH 3/4] igb: add support for ext... Keller, Jacob E
- [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for extended PHC getti... Miroslav Lichvar
- RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for extended ... Keller, Jacob E
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for exten... Miroslav Lichvar
- RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for e... Keller, Jacob E
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for e... Richard Cochran
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support f... Miroslav Lichvar
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add supp... Richard Cochran
- RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add ... Keller, Jacob E
- RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support f... Keller, Jacob E
- [RFC PATCH 2/4] e1000e: add support for extended PHC gett... Miroslav Lichvar
- RE: [RFC PATCH 0/4] More accurate PHC<->system cloc... Keller, Jacob E
- RE: [RFC PATCH 0/4] More accurate PHC<->system cloc... Keller, Jacob E
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] More accurate PHC<->system cloc... Richard Cochran