> -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Cochran [mailto:richardcoch...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2018 7:40 AM > To: Miroslav Lichvar <mlich...@redhat.com> > Cc: Keller, Jacob E <jacob.e.kel...@intel.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; > intel-wired- > l...@lists.osuosl.org > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for extended PHC gettime > > On Mon, Oct 29, 2018 at 02:31:09PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote: > > I think there could be a flag in ptp_system_timestamp, or a parameter > > of gettimex64(), which would enable/disable reading of the system > > clock. > > I'm not a fan of functions that change their behavior based on flags > in their input parameters. > > Thanks, > Richard Neither am I. I do however want to find a solution that avoids having drivers needlessly duplicate almost the same functionality. Thanks, Jake
- Re: [RFC PATCH 3/4] igb: add support for extende... Miroslav Lichvar
- RE: [RFC PATCH 3/4] igb: add support for ext... Keller, Jacob E
- [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for extended PHC getti... Miroslav Lichvar
- RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for extended ... Keller, Jacob E
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for exten... Miroslav Lichvar
- RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for e... Keller, Jacob E
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support for e... Richard Cochran
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support f... Miroslav Lichvar
- Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add supp... Richard Cochran
- RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add ... Keller, Jacob E
- RE: [RFC PATCH 4/4] ixgbe: add support f... Keller, Jacob E
- [RFC PATCH 2/4] e1000e: add support for extended PHC gett... Miroslav Lichvar
- RE: [RFC PATCH 0/4] More accurate PHC<->system cloc... Keller, Jacob E
- RE: [RFC PATCH 0/4] More accurate PHC<->system cloc... Keller, Jacob E
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] More accurate PHC<->system cloc... Richard Cochran