On Wed, 31 Oct 2018 21:49:24 +0530 Leslie Monis <lesliemo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The current implementation of PIE queueing discipline is according to an IETF > draft [http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-pan-aqm-pie-00] and the paper > [PIE: A Lightweight Control Scheme to Address the Bufferbloat Problem]. > However, a lot of necessary modifications and enhancements have been proposed > in RFC 8033, which have not yet been incorporated in the source code of Linux > kernel. The following series of patches helps in achieving the same. > > This patch series includes: > > 1. Change the value of QUEUE_THRESHOLD > 2. Change the default value of pie_params->target > 3. Change the default value of pie_params->tupdate > 4. Change the initial value of pie_vars->burst_time > 5. Add more conditions to auto-tune alpha and beta > 6. Add mechanism to set PIE active/inactive > 7. Add a derandomization mechanism > 8. Update references > > Mohit P. Tahiliani (8): > net: sched: pie: change value of QUEUE_THRESHOLD > net: sched: pie: change default value of pie_params->target > net: sched: pie: change default value of pie_params->tupdate > net: sched: pie: change initial value of pie_vars->burst_time > net: sched: pie: add more conditions to auto-tune alpha and beta > net: sched: pie: add mechanism to set PIE active/inactive > net: sched: pie: add derandomization mechanism > net: sched: pie: update references > > net/sched/sch_pie.c | 77 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) > Did you do performance tests? Often the RFC is out of date and the actual values are better than those in the standard.
