On Wednesday, 18 October 2006 12:16, David Miller wrote: > From: Dawid Ciezarkiewicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2006 11:51:46 +0200 > > > I've tried to put ccrypt handlers as close to hardware xmit and recv as > > possible so local reorder doesn't matter. Medium doesn't reorder frames and > > switches, bridges shouldn't do that neither (but as Stephen J. Bevan said > > this may not be always true). > > You can put it all the way in netif_receive_skb() and you still > can see reordering of receive packets on an SMP system.
Thanks for pointing that out. As every frame reorder will cost "only" one real frame to by lost I need to investigate this issue and get more real testing in such environments. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
