Stephen Hemminger wrote: > Ethernet encrypted bridging is old stuff: > http://kerneltrap.org/node/167 > http://www.arnor.net/encryptingbridge/ > > It never got accepted, mostly for the same reasons this proposal > is a dead end.
>From what I can see in the brief description is that ccrypt is more general as it is not limited to ethernet bridging code, UDP and AES. Unfortunately I cannot find any replies to the announcement you've mentioned and thus I am and was not aware of the objections to the encrypted bridging idea. I knew the encrypted bridging project before starting to think about ccrypt, BTW. -- Pawel Foremski [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
