On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 16:33:55 -0700
Eric Dumazet <eric.duma...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 08/02/2018 03:54 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu,  2 Aug 2018 22:45:58 +0000
> > Peter Oskolkov <p...@google.com> wrote:
> >   
> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h b/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
> >> index e5ebc83827ab..da1a144f1a51 100644
> >> --- a/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
> >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/snmp.h
> >> @@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ enum
> >>    IPSTATS_MIB_REASMREQDS,                 /* ReasmReqds */
> >>    IPSTATS_MIB_REASMOKS,                   /* ReasmOKs */
> >>    IPSTATS_MIB_REASMFAILS,                 /* ReasmFails */
> >> +  IPSTATS_MIB_REASM_OVERLAPS,             /* ReasmOverlaps */
> >>    IPSTATS_MIB_FRAGOKS,                    /* FragOKs */
> >>    IPSTATS_MIB_FRAGFAILS,                  /* FragFails */
> >>    IPSTATS_MIB_FRAGCREATES,                /* FragCreates */  
> > 
> > Inserting new entries in the middle of an enum means the numeric
> > values will change. Isn't this going to break userspace ABI?
> >   
> 
> I would argue the only exported thing from the kernel are the Key:Val in the 
> /proc files.
> 
> Not sure why these enum are uapi.
> 
> Commit 46c2fa39877ed70415ee2b1acfb9129e956f6de4 added 
> LINUX_MIB_TCPFASTOPENBLACKHOLE in the middle,
> and really nobody complained.
> 
> 
> Commit 0604475119de5f80dc051a5db055c6a2a75bd542 added 
> LINUX_MIBSTCPMEMORYPRESSURESCHRONO
> in the middle as well.
> 
> I am pretty sure we should maintain locality of these counters to lower number
> of dirtied cache lines, say under IP frag DDOS ;)
> 

Agree with eric, go ahead and keep things local

Reply via email to