On 7/24/18 11:55 AM, Xin Long wrote: > INFO: bc_forwarding disabled on r1 => > INFO: h1 -> net2: reply from r1 (not forwarding) > TEST: ping 198.51.100.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1 [PASS] > INFO: h1 -> net3: reply from r1 (not forwarding) > TEST: ping 198.51.200.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1 [PASS] > INFO: h1 -> net1: reply from r1 (not dropping) > TEST: ping 192.0.2.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1 [PASS] > .... > how about this?
Personally, I think that is backwards. So like this: INFO: bc_forwarding disabled on r1 => INFO: ping 198.51.100.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1 TEST: h1 -> net2: reply from r1 (not forwarding) [PASS] INFO: ping 198.51.200.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1 TEST: h1 -> net3: reply from r1 (not forwarding) [PASS] INFO: ping 192.0.2.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1 TEST: h1 -> net1: reply from r1 (not dropping) [PASS] ...