On 7/24/18 11:55 AM, Xin Long wrote:
> INFO: bc_forwarding disabled on r1 =>
> INFO: h1 -> net2: reply from r1 (not forwarding)
> TEST: ping 198.51.100.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1            [PASS]
> INFO: h1 -> net3: reply from r1 (not forwarding)
> TEST: ping 198.51.200.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1            [PASS]
> INFO: h1 -> net1: reply from r1 (not dropping)
> TEST: ping 192.0.2.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1               [PASS]
> ....
> how about this?

Personally, I think that is backwards. So like this:

INFO: bc_forwarding disabled on r1 =>
INFO: ping 198.51.100.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1
TEST: h1 -> net2: reply from r1 (not forwarding)              [PASS]
INFO: ping 198.51.200.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1
TEST: h1 -> net3: reply from r1 (not forwarding)              [PASS]
INFO: ping 192.0.2.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1
TEST: h1 -> net1: reply from r1 (not dropping)                [PASS]
...

Reply via email to