On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 1:37 AM, David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/24/18 11:24 AM, Xin Long wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 23, 2018 at 11:17 PM, David Ahern <dsah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 7/23/18 5:51 AM, Xin Long wrote:
>>>> +ping_ipv4()
>>>> +{
>>>> + sysctl_set net.ipv4.icmp_echo_ignore_broadcasts 0
>>>> +
>>>> + bc_forwarding_disable
>>>> + ping_test_from $h1 198.51.100.255 192.0.2.1
>>>> + ping_test_from $h1 198.51.200.255 192.0.2.1
>>>> + ping_test_from $h1 192.0.2.255 192.0.2.1
>>>> + ping_test_from $h1 255.255.255.255 192.0.2.1
>>>> +
>>>> + ping_test_from $h2 192.0.2.255 198.51.100.1
>>>> + ping_test_from $h2 198.51.200.255 198.51.100.1
>>>> + ping_test_from $h2 198.51.100.255 198.51.100.1
>>>> + ping_test_from $h2 255.255.255.255 198.51.100.1
>>>> + bc_forwarding_restore
>>>> +
>>>> + bc_forwarding_enable
>>>> + ping_test_from $h1 198.51.100.255 198.51.100.2
>>>> + ping_test_from $h1 198.51.200.255 198.51.200.2
>>>> + ping_test_from $h1 192.0.2.255 192.0.2.1 1
>>>> + ping_test_from $h1 255.255.255.255 192.0.2.1
>>>> +
>>>> + ping_test_from $h2 192.0.2.255 192.0.2.2
>>>> + ping_test_from $h2 198.51.200.255 198.51.200.2
>>>> + ping_test_from $h2 198.51.100.255 198.51.100.1 1
>>>> + ping_test_from $h2 255.255.255.255 198.51.100.1
>>>> + bc_forwarding_restore
>>>> +
>>>> + sysctl_restore net.ipv4.icmp_echo_ignore_broadcasts
>>>
>>> You need a better description for each test. This output:
>>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>>> ...
>>>
>>> does not help in understanding which cases are working and which are not.
>> # ./router_broadcast.sh
>> INFO: bc_forwarding disabled on r1=>
>> INFO: h1 -> net2: reply from r1 (not forwarding)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: h1 -> net3: reply from r1 (not forwarding)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: h1 -> net1: reply from r1 (not dropping)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: h1 -> 255.255.255.255: reply from r1 (not forwarding)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: h2 -> net1: reply from r1 (not forwarding)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: h2 -> net3: reply from r1 (not forwarding)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: h2 -> net2: reply from r1 (not dropping)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: h2 -> 255.255.255.255: reply from r1 (not forwarding)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: bc_forwarding enabled on r1 =>
>> INFO: h1 -> net2: reply from h2 (forwarding)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: h1 -> net3: reply from h3 (forwarding)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: h1 -> net1: no reply (dropping)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: h1 -> 255.255.255.255: reply from r1 (not forwarding)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: h2 -> net1: reply from h3 (forwarding)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: h2 -> net3: reply from h1 (forwarding)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: h2 -> net2: no reply (dropping)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>> INFO: h2 -> 255.255.255.255: reply from r1 (not forwarding)
>> TEST: ping_test_from [PASS]
>>
>> I hope this log looks good to you?
>>
>
> The extra INFO is good, but the TEST line needs a better description.
>
INFO: bc_forwarding disabled on r1 =>
INFO: h1 -> net2: reply from r1 (not forwarding)
TEST: ping 198.51.100.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1 [PASS]
INFO: h1 -> net3: reply from r1 (not forwarding)
TEST: ping 198.51.200.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1 [PASS]
INFO: h1 -> net1: reply from r1 (not dropping)
TEST: ping 192.0.2.255, expected reply from 192.0.2.1 [PASS]
....
how about this?
