Two rules with different values of suppress_prefix or suppress_ifgroup
are not the same. This fixes an -EEXIST when running:

   $ ip -4 rule add table main suppress_prefixlength 0

Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com>
Fixes: f9d4b0c1e969 ("fib_rules: move common handling of newrule delrule msgs 
into fib_nl2rule")
---
This adds the new condition you mentioned. I'm not sure what you make of
DaveM's remark about this not being in the original code, but here is
nonetheless the requested change.

 net/core/fib_rules.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/core/fib_rules.c b/net/core/fib_rules.c
index 126ffc5bc630..bc8425d81022 100644
--- a/net/core/fib_rules.c
+++ b/net/core/fib_rules.c
@@ -416,6 +416,14 @@ static struct fib_rule *rule_find(struct fib_rules_ops 
*ops,
                if (rule->mark && r->mark != rule->mark)
                        continue;
 
+               if (rule->suppress_ifgroup != -1 &&
+                   r->suppress_ifgroup != rule->suppress_ifgroup)
+                       continue;
+
+               if (rule->suppress_prefixlen != -1 &&
+                   r->suppress_prefixlen != rule->suppress_prefixlen)
+                       continue;
+
                if (rule->mark_mask && r->mark_mask != rule->mark_mask)
                        continue;
 
-- 
2.17.1

Reply via email to