On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 8:59 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com> wrote:
> Two rules with different values of suppress_prefix or suppress_ifgroup
> are not the same. This fixes an -EEXIST when running:
>
>    $ ip -4 rule add table main suppress_prefixlength 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <ja...@zx2c4.com>
> Fixes: f9d4b0c1e969 ("fib_rules: move common handling of newrule delrule msgs 
> into fib_nl2rule")
> ---
>  net/core/fib_rules.c | 6 ++++++
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/core/fib_rules.c b/net/core/fib_rules.c
> index 126ffc5bc630..665799311b98 100644
> --- a/net/core/fib_rules.c
> +++ b/net/core/fib_rules.c
> @@ -416,6 +416,12 @@ static struct fib_rule *rule_find(struct fib_rules_ops 
> *ops,
>                 if (rule->mark && r->mark != rule->mark)
>                         continue;
>
> +               if (r->suppress_ifgroup != rule->suppress_ifgroup)
> +                       continue;
> +
> +               if (r->suppress_prefixlen != rule->suppress_prefixlen)
> +                       continue;
> +
>                 if (rule->mark_mask && r->mark_mask != rule->mark_mask)
>                         continue;
>

Can you please change the check to compare only if the new rule has
the attributes set ?

eg:

if (rule->suppress_ifgroup != -1 && (r->suppress_ifgroup !=
rule->suppress_ifgroup))

same thing for suppress_prefixlen

Reply via email to