On 3/7/18 10:28 AM, David Ahern wrote: > On 3/7/18 4:53 AM, Kirill Tkhai wrote: >>> diff --git a/include/net/addrconf.h b/include/net/addrconf.h >>> index c4185a7b0e90..132e5b95167a 100644 >>> --- a/include/net/addrconf.h >>> +++ b/include/net/addrconf.h >>> @@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ int addrconf_set_dstaddr(struct net *net, void __user >>> *arg); >>> int ipv6_chk_addr(struct net *net, const struct in6_addr *addr, >>> const struct net_device *dev, int strict); >>> int ipv6_chk_addr_and_flags(struct net *net, const struct in6_addr *addr, >>> - const struct net_device *dev, int strict, >>> - u32 banned_flags); >>> + const struct net_device *dev, bool skip_dev_check, >>> + int strict, u32 banned_flags); >> >> This function already has 5 arguments, while this patch adds one more. >> Can't we use new flags argument for both of them? >> >> Also, the name of function and input parameters are already so big, that they >> don't fit a single line already, while your patch adds more parameters. >> Can't we make it more slim? Something like ipv6_chk_addr_fl() instead of >> current >> name. > > I think I can combine strict and the new skip_dev_check. I am going to > leave the function name as is. >
Upon further review, I can not combine those flags; I missed a level of () around the scope check which is what strict modifies. They need to be separate arguments.
