Hi Andrew,

Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> writes:

> -static int mv88e6xxx_get_sset_count(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
> +static int _mv88e6xxx_get_sset_count(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
>  {
>       struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = ds->priv;
>  
> @@ -702,6 +706,19 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_get_sset_count(struct dsa_switch 
> *ds, int port)
>       return 0;
>  }

We worked to remove the old underscore prefix convention. Please don't
add it back... Simply rework the return statements of
mv88e6xxx_get_sset_count to lock/unlock there.

>  
> +static int mv88e6xxx_get_sset_count(struct dsa_switch *ds, int port)
> +{
> +     struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip = ds->priv;
> +     int ret;
> +
> +     mutex_lock(&chip->reg_lock);
> +     ret = _mv88e6xxx_get_sset_count(ds, port);
> +     mutex_unlock(&chip->reg_lock);
> +
> +     return ret;
> +}
> +
> +

Extra newline.

>  static void mv88e6xxx_stats_get_stats(struct mv88e6xxx_chip *chip, int port,
>                                     uint64_t *data, int types,
>                                     u16 bank1_select, u16 histogram)

Thanks,

        Vivien

Reply via email to