From: Jiri Pirko <j...@resnulli.us>
Date: Mon, 25 Dec 2017 09:02:54 +0100
> Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 08:57:35AM CET, j...@resnulli.us wrote:
>>From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
>>
>>When we remove the neighbour associated with a nexthop we should always
>>refuse to write the nexthop to the adjacency table. Regardless if it is
>>already present in the table or not.
>>
>>Otherwise, we risk dereferencing the NULL pointer that was set instead
>>of the neighbour.
>>
>>Fixes: a7ff87acd995 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Implement next-hop routing")
>>Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
>>Reported-by: Alexander Petrovskiy <ale...@mellanox.com>
>>Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
>
> Dave, could you please queue this up for 4.14.y together
> with "mlxsw: spectrum: Relax sanity checks during enslavement".
Both applied and queued up for -stable.
