From: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
When we remove the neighbour associated with a nexthop we should always
refuse to write the nexthop to the adjacency table. Regardless if it is
already present in the table or not.
Otherwise, we risk dereferencing the NULL pointer that was set instead
of the neighbour.
Fixes: a7ff87acd995 ("mlxsw: spectrum_router: Implement next-hop routing")
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <ido...@mellanox.com>
Reported-by: Alexander Petrovskiy <ale...@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <j...@mellanox.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
index be657b8..434b392 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlxsw/spectrum_router.c
@@ -3228,7 +3228,7 @@ static void __mlxsw_sp_nexthop_neigh_update(struct
mlxsw_sp_nexthop *nh,
{
if (!removing)
nh->should_offload = 1;
- else if (nh->offloaded)
+ else
nh->should_offload = 0;
nh->update = 1;
}
--
2.9.5
