On Wed, 20 Dec 2017 09:37:30 +0200 Serhey Popovych <serhe.popov...@gmail.com> wrote:
> In case of we update existing entry we need not only rehash > but also update name in existing entry. > > Need to update device type too since cached interface might > be deleted and new with same index, but different type > added (e.g. eth0 and ppp0). > > Reuse new entry initialization path to avoid duplications. > > Signed-off-by: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popov...@gmail.com> Can you provide an example where this is an observed bug? I suspect that unless you use a batch mode command the reload of the cache on next invocation is solving this.
