On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Sven Eckelmann <sven.eckelm...@openmesh.com> wrote: > On Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017 11:57:55 CET Willem de Bruijn wrote: >> > No, this is also bad because batman_adv.h is MIT license and packet.h is >> > GPL-2. So what other name would you suggest for packet.h? >> > batman_adv_packet.h? >> >> Sure, that sounds great. Thanks. > > Really? Isn't include/uapi/linux/batman_adv_packet.h looking like an accident > which never should have had happened?
My only point was that renaming and modifying existing uapi files can break userspace compilation. As long as the existing files are not changed, I don't have a strong opinion on naming for new files.
