On Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017 11:32:05 CET Sven Eckelmann wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 6. Dezember 2017 11:58:14 CET Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> [...]
> > >> > ---
> > >> >  MAINTAINERS                                        | 2 +-
> > >> >  include/uapi/linux/{batman_adv.h => batadv_genl.h} | 6 +++---
> > >>
> > >> This and the previous patch changes uapi. That might break userspace
> > >> applications that rely on it.
> > >
> > > I am not aware of any application because all (alfred, batctl and some 
> > > gluon
> > > integration) of them currently ship their own copy because distribution 
> > > didn't
> > > catch up. And this is also the reason why I want to do it now - not later.
> > 
> > That assumes that you know all applications, including those not
> > publicly available. It may be true in this instance, but it is not
> > possible to be certain.
> 
> I've just talked with Simon. Because you have a problem with these two 
> changes, he suggested that I should drop these two patches and merge packet.h 
> with the uapi batadv genl header batman_adv.h

No, this is also bad because batman_adv.h is MIT license and packet.h is 
GPL-2. So what other name would you suggest for packet.h? batman_adv_packet.h?

Kind regards,
        Sven

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to