On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 12:57:22PM -0800, Shannon Nelson wrote:
> The current XFRM code assumes that we've implemented the
> xdo_dev_state_free() callback, even if it is meaningless to the driver.
> This patch adds a check for it before calling, as done in other APIs,
> and is done for the xdo_state_offload_ok() callback.
> 
> Also, we add a check for the required add and delete functions up front
> at registration time to be sure both are defined, and complain if not.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Nelson <shannon.nel...@oracle.com>
> ---
>  include/net/xfrm.h     |  3 ++-
>  net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
>  2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/net/xfrm.h b/include/net/xfrm.h
> index e015e16..dfabd04 100644
> --- a/include/net/xfrm.h
> +++ b/include/net/xfrm.h
> @@ -1891,7 +1891,8 @@ static inline void xfrm_dev_state_free(struct 
> xfrm_state *x)
>        struct net_device *dev = xso->dev;
>  
>       if (dev && dev->xfrmdev_ops) {
> -             dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(x);
> +             if (dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free)
> +                     dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_free(x);
>               xso->dev = NULL;
>               dev_put(dev);
>       }
> diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> index 30e5746..0df1cc2 100644
> --- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> +++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_device.c
> @@ -144,11 +144,21 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(xfrm_dev_offload_ok);
>  
>  static int xfrm_dev_register(struct net_device *dev)
>  {
> -     if ((dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP) && !dev->xfrmdev_ops)
> -             return NOTIFY_BAD;
> -     if ((dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP_TX_CSUM) &&
> -         !(dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP))
> +     if (!(dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP)) {
> +             if (dev->features & NETIF_F_HW_ESP_TX_CSUM) {
> +                     netdev_err(dev, "NETIF_F_HW_ESP_TX_CSUM without 
> NETIF_F_HW_ESP\n");
> +                     return NOTIFY_BAD;
> +             } else {
> +                     return NOTIFY_DONE;
> +             }
> +     }
> +
> +     if (!(dev->xfrmdev_ops &&
> +           dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_add &&
> +           dev->xfrmdev_ops->xdo_dev_state_delete)) {
> +             netdev_err(dev, "add or delete function missing from 
> xfrmdev_ops\n");

Please remove these error printings, this is not relevant for normal
users.

Reply via email to