On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 5:18 PM, David Laight <david.lai...@aculab.com> wrote:
> From: Saeed Mahameed
>> Sent: 17 August 2017 14:30
>> To: David S. Miller
>> Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org; Leon Romanovsky; Or Gerlitz; Saeed Mahameed
>> Subject: [net-next 11/15] net/mlx5e: Properly indent within conditional
>> statements
>>
>> From: Or Gerlitz <ogerl...@mellanox.com>
>>
>> To fix these checkpatch complaints:
>>
>> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 24)
>> + if (eth_proto & (MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_10GBASE_SR)
>> [...]
>> + return PORT_FIBRE;
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Or Gerlitz <ogerl...@mellanox.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <sae...@mellanox.com>
>> ---
>> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c | 22
>> +++++++++++-----------
>> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c
>> index a75ac4d11c5b..ed161312a773 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c
>> @@ -988,23 +988,23 @@ static u8 get_connector_port(u32 eth_proto, u8
>> connector_type)
>> return ptys2connector_type[connector_type];
>>
>> if (eth_proto & (MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_10GBASE_SR)
>> - | MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_40GBASE_SR4)
>> - | MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_100GBASE_SR4)
>> - | MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_1000BASE_CX_SGMII))) {
>> - return PORT_FIBRE;
>> + | MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_40GBASE_SR4)
>> + | MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_100GBASE_SR4)
>> + | MLX5E_PROT_MASK(MLX5E_1000BASE_CX_SGMII))) {
>> + return PORT_FIBRE;
>
> Gah, that is why the rules are stupid.
> If anything the continuation lines want indenting a few more bytes.
>
Totally agree,
But if Or wants to follow the rules, I won't stand in his way :).
> David
>
