On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 06:16:03AM -0400, jamal wrote: > > I still have my setup intact, so i will give this a whirl in about 3-4 > hours. It does look promising - an atomic should be a lot cheaper than a > lock. Thanks Herbert.
Well it's not that good since the current code only takes the lock in exceptional circumstances while my patch does the atomic op unconditionally. But then again the current code is wrong :) Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
