On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 01:46:15PM -0600, David Ahern wrote: > On 7/13/17 1:11 PM, David Ahern wrote: > > Since mlxsw is not doing a get on the rule to increase the ref count, it > > should not be doing a put. > > upon further review, mlxsw is doing a get on the rule > > Problem remains, but this is not the right fix.
Remains where? It's not clear to me how you concluded mlxsw is at fault. My setup is running net-next with the refcount patches and I didn't observe this. If current trace isn't enough to pinpoint the problem, can you try to reproduce with a KASAN enabled kernel?
