On 7/13/17 1:11 PM, David Ahern wrote: > Since mlxsw is not doing a get on the rule to increase the ref count, it > should not be doing a put.
upon further review, mlxsw is doing a get on the rule Problem remains, but this is not the right fix.
On 7/13/17 1:11 PM, David Ahern wrote: > Since mlxsw is not doing a get on the rule to increase the ref count, it > should not be doing a put.
upon further review, mlxsw is doing a get on the rule Problem remains, but this is not the right fix.