On Fri, Jun 30, 2017 at 10:30:38AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 06/30/2017 02:25 AM, Alvaro Gamez Machado wrote:
> > if (lp->phy_node) {
> > - if (lp->phy_type == XAE_PHY_TYPE_GMII) {
> > + if (lp->phy_type == XAE_PHY_TYPE_MII) {
> > + phydev = of_phy_connect(lp->ndev, lp->phy_node,
> > + axienet_adjust_link, 0,
> > + PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_MII);
> > + } else if (lp->phy_type == XAE_PHY_TYPE_GMII) {
> > phydev = of_phy_connect(lp->ndev, lp->phy_node,
> > axienet_adjust_link, 0,
> > PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_GMII);
>
> Seems like this could be simplified even further if the values of
> lp->phy_type directly mapped to those of phy_interface_t.
Sadly, that's not the case. PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_* belong to a enum of twenty
different values, of which only _MII and _GMII overlap with XAW_PHY_*
values, but XAE_PHY_TYPE_RGMII_2_0 doesn't match
PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RGMII_ID.
Regards
--
Alvaro G. M.
