On Wed, 14 Jun 2017 10:54:31 +0800 严海双 <yanhaishu...@cmss.chinamobile.com> wrote:
> > Changes since v2: > > * mask key->tos with RT_TOS() suggested by Daniel Can you help me understand the rationale for this change? Is there are bug introduced by dsfield = ip6_tclass(key->label); ? The RT_TOS masks out 4bits of the 8bit tos field in accordance with RFC1349 (obsoleted by RFC2474). IPv6 does not have a TOS field. So it dosen't make sense to apply a TOS value to the outer header of an IPv6 tunnel.
