On 06/13/2017 03:31 PM, 严海双 wrote:
On 13 Jun 2017, at 5:57 PM, Daniel Borkmann <dan...@iogearbox.net> wrote:
On 06/13/2017 09:55 AM, Haishuang Yan wrote:
Same as ip_gre, geneve and vxlan, use key->tos as tos value.
Please also add Fixes tag and Cc original authors.
Fixes: 0e9a709560db ("ip6_tunnel, ip6_gre: fix setting of DSCP on encapsulated
packets”)
Ok, I will add it, thanks
Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan <yanhaishu...@cmss.chinamobile.com>
---
net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
index ef99d59..5f4aff5 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_tunnel.c
@@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@ int ip6_tnl_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device
*dev, __u8 dsfield,
fl6.flowi6_proto = IPPROTO_IPIP;
fl6.daddr = key->u.ipv6.dst;
fl6.flowlabel = key->label;
- dsfield = ip6_tclass(key->label);
+ dsfield = key->tos;
Not exactly the same as vxlan / geneve. They do use key->tos
indeed, but they also set fl6.flowlabel differently:
[...]
prio = info->key.tos;
[...]
fl6->flowlabel = ip6_make_flowinfo(RT_TOS(prio),
info->key.label);
[...]
But looks like the latter is done later in ip6_tnl_xmit() eventually
before the route lookup as per 5f733ee68f9a ("ip6_tunnel: fix traffic
class routing for tunnels") fix. However, you still might want to
mask key->tos with RT_TOS().
Do you mean this way?
This one from my last comment: dsfield = RT_TOS(key->tos)
