On 18/05/17 01:16, David Miller wrote:
> So, in C, addition (a += b) is something like:
>
> struct bpf_reg_bits {
> u64 zero_bits;
> u64 one_bits;
> };
>
> static void add_update_bits(struct bpf_reg_bits *a, struct bpf_reg_bits *b)
> {
> u64 m_zeros, m_ones, m_all;
>
> m_zeros = a->zero_bits ^ b->zero_bits;
> m_ones = a->one_bits ^ b->one_bits;
> m_all = m_zeros | m_ones;
No, this should be
u64 m_a, m_b, m_all;
m_a = a->zero_bits ^ a->one_bits; /* unknown bits in a */
m_b = b->zero_bits ^ b->one_bits; /* unknown bits in b */
m_all = m_a | m_b; /* unknown bits in result */
> a->zero_bits = (a->zero_bits + b->zero_bits) | m_all;
> a->one_bits = (a->one_bits + b->zero_bits) & ~m_all;
> }
>
> Then, is subtraction merely:
>
> static void sub_update_bits(struct bpf_reg_bits *a, struct bpf_reg_bits *b)
> {
> u64 m_zeros, m_ones, m_all;
>
> m_zeros = a->zero_bits ^ b->zero_bits;
> m_ones = a->one_bits ^ b->one_bits;
> m_all = m_zeros | m_ones;
>
> a->zero_bits = (a->zero_bits - b->zero_bits) | m_all;
> a->one_bits = (a->one_bits - b->zero_bits) & ~m_all;
> }
>
> Or is something different needed?
I suspect it's something different, just because I worry about what
carries will do.
But I think Alexei's idea (mask and value) is better anyway; at the
least it's easier to think about.
-Ed
