On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 1:11 PM, David Miller <da...@davemloft.net> wrote:
> From: Johannes Berg <johan...@sipsolutions.net>
> Date: Mon, 08 May 2017 10:55:12 +0200
>
>>
>>> +static inline bool netif_is_lwd(struct net_device *dev)
>>> +{
>>> + return !!(dev->priv_flags & IFF_LWT_NETDEV);
>>> +}
>>
>> Am I the only one who thinks that this "LWT_NETDEV" vs "LWD" is a bit
>> confusing?
>
> Agreed, my old eyes can't discern them at a distance :-)
agree.
mix of LWT_NETDEV and LWD can get confusing.
LWT already stands for Light Weight Tunnel...,
this can only be LWD or LWN ;)....if people don't confuse it with
some weekly news device :)
