From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2006 18:18:16 -0400 (EDT)

> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 10 Jul 2006 15:00:45 -0700 (PDT)), 
> David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> 
> > > If IPv6 addresses are ordered by scope, then ipv6_dev_get_saddr() can 
> > > break-out of the device addr_list for() loop when the candidate source 
> > > address scope is less than the destination address scope.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Brian Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > This patch looks fine to me, it's an optimization and not a
> > correctness issue.
> > 
> > But I'd like an ACK from an ipv6 developer, such as Yoshifuji, before
> > adding this patch.
> 
> I agree, too.
> Note: People should not depend on the order of addresses.
> 
> Acked-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Thank you for reviewing, patch applied.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to