On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 9:47 PM, Andrew Lunn <and...@lunn.ch> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 04:43:15PM +0800, Greentime Hu wrote:
>> To support device tree usage for ftmac100.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <green...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c
>> b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c
>> index dce5f7b..81dd9e1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/faraday/ftmac100.c
>> @@ -1172,11 +1172,17 @@ static int __exit ftmac100_remove(struct
>> platform_device *pdev)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> +static const struct of_device_id mac_of_ids[] = {
>> + { .compatible = "andestech,atmac100" },
>> + { }
>
> andestech is not in
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/vendor-prefixes.txt Please provide a
> separate patch adding it.
OK. I will provide another patch to add andestech.
> Humm, why andestech? Why not something based around faraday
> technology?
It is because we use the same ftmac100 IP provided from faraday
technology but I am now using it in andestech SoC.
