From: "Michael Chan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 14:20:29 -0700
> David, So do we want to fix this issue as proposed by Herbert to replace > tx_lock with xmit_lock? It seems quite straightforward to do. For this > change to work, netpoll also needs to be fixed up a bit to check for > LLTX before getting the xmit_lock. Oh yes, netpoll needs changes, thanks for noticing that. That's why I had the idea to make xmit_lock a pointer, so that things like that netpoll case could be transparent. I think this netpoll wrinkle means we also have to make sure to set the xmit_lock_owner across the board. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
