Hi Sergei, David,

I think modifying that as below is clear and scalable. Agree?

static bool mtk_is_hwlro_supported(struct mtk_eth *eth)
{
        switch (eth->chip_id) {
        case MT7623_ETH:
                return true;
        }

        return false;
}

Thanks.


Nelson
-----Original Message-----
From: David Laight [mailto:david.lai...@aculab.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2016 9:07 PM
To: Nelson Chang (張家祥); sergei.shtyl...@cogentembedded.com;
j...@phrozen.org; da...@davemloft.net
Cc: n...@openwrt.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org;
linux-media...@lists.infradead.org; nelsonch...@gmail.com
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 2/3] net: ethernet: mediatek: get hw lro
capability by the chip id instead of by the dtsi

From: Nelson Chang
> Sent: 05 October 2016 13:46
> > +static bool mtk_is_hwlro_supported(struct mtk_eth *eth) {
> > +     if (eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH)
> > +             return true;
> > +     else
> > +             return false;
> 
>         return eth->chip_id == MT7623_ETH;
> 
> => Since there will be more chips support hw lro in the future, keep 
> the original codes to have the scalability like this:
> if (eth->chip_id == MTxxxx_ETH ||
>     eth->chip_id == MTyyyy_ETH ||
>     ....)
>       return true;

Nothing wrong with:

        return eth->chip_id == MTxxxx_ETH ||
                eth->chip_id == MTyyyy_ETH;

        David



Reply via email to