On 16-09-26 02:02 AM, Hadar Hen Zion wrote:
On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Cong Wang <xiyou.wangc...@gmail.com> wrote:
The reason is we use action->order as an nested attribute, so
the order in the list doesn't matter, only action->order itself matters.
The order in the list matters for offload drivers who use the
"tcf_exts_to_list" function and action->order parameter isn't usable
for them.
Ok, thanks for the explanation.
Why not keeping the actions in the same order as the user? isn't it
more elegant?
I dont think it was intentional. I will ACK the patch.
cheers,
jamal
