On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de> wrote:
> struct mlx5e_channel_param is a large structure that is allocated
> on the stack of mlx5e_open_channels, and with a recent change
> it has grown beyond the warning size for the maximum stack
> that a single function should use:
>
> mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c: In function 'mlx5e_open_channels':
> mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c:1325:1: error: the frame size of 1072 bytes is
> larger than 1024 bytes [-Werror=frame-larger-than=]
>
> The function is already using dynamic allocation and is not in
> a fast path, so the easiest workaround is to use another kzalloc
> for allocating the channel parameters.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> Fixes: d3c9bc2743dc ("net/mlx5e: Added ICO SQs")
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 21 +++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> index 22742e1fbcb9..2ec547a80886 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
> @@ -1266,12 +1266,14 @@ static void mlx5e_build_icosq_param(struct mlx5e_priv
> *priv,
> param->icosq = true;
> }
>
> -static void mlx5e_build_channel_param(struct mlx5e_priv *priv,
> - struct mlx5e_channel_param *cparam)
> +static struct mlx5e_channel_param *mlx5e_build_channel_param(struct
> mlx5e_priv *priv)
I prefer to keep the function prototype as before and move the dynamic
allocation to mlx5e_open_channels,
to keep alloc/free symmetric in mlx5e_open_channels.
> {
> + struct mlx5e_channel_param *cparam;
> u8 icosq_log_wq_sz = MLX5E_PARAMS_MINIMUM_LOG_SQ_SIZE;
>
> - memset(cparam, 0, sizeof(*cparam));
> + cparam = kzalloc(sizeof(struct mlx5e_channel_param), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!cparam)
> + return NULL;
>
> mlx5e_build_rq_param(priv, &cparam->rq);
> mlx5e_build_sq_param(priv, &cparam->sq);
> @@ -1279,11 +1281,13 @@ static void mlx5e_build_channel_param(struct
> mlx5e_priv *priv,
> mlx5e_build_rx_cq_param(priv, &cparam->rx_cq);
> mlx5e_build_tx_cq_param(priv, &cparam->tx_cq);
> mlx5e_build_ico_cq_param(priv, &cparam->icosq_cq, icosq_log_wq_sz);
> +
> + return cparam;
> }
>
> static int mlx5e_open_channels(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
> {
> - struct mlx5e_channel_param cparam;
> + struct mlx5e_channel_param *cparam;
> int nch = priv->params.num_channels;
> int err = -ENOMEM;
> int i;
> @@ -1298,9 +1302,12 @@ static int mlx5e_open_channels(struct mlx5e_priv *priv)
You can do the allocation here, then you can benefit from the next
allocation check to test the 3 allocations altogether.
i.e:
if (!cparam || !priv->channel || !priv->txq_to_sq_map)
goto err_free_txq_to_sq_map;
> if (!priv->channel || !priv->txq_to_sq_map)
> goto err_free_txq_to_sq_map;
>
> - mlx5e_build_channel_param(priv, &cparam);
> + cparam = mlx5e_build_channel_param(priv);
> + if (!cparam)
> + goto err_free_txq_to_sq_map;
> +
> for (i = 0; i < nch; i++) {
> - err = mlx5e_open_channel(priv, i, &cparam, &priv->channel[i]);
> + err = mlx5e_open_channel(priv, i, cparam, &priv->channel[i]);
> if (err)
> goto err_close_channels;
> }
> @@ -1311,11 +1318,13 @@ static int mlx5e_open_channels(struct mlx5e_priv
> *priv)
> goto err_close_channels;
> }
>
> + kfree(cparam);
> return 0;
>
> err_close_channels:
> for (i--; i >= 0; i--)
> mlx5e_close_channel(priv->channel[i]);
> + kfree(cparam);
>
> err_free_txq_to_sq_map:
> kfree(priv->txq_to_sq_map);
> --
> 2.7.0
>
Saeed.
