On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 03:41:43 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote: > On 04/22/16 at 11:20pm, Jiri Benc wrote: > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:04:48 -0700, pravin shelar wrote: > > > I think we should we return error in case of such configuration rather > > > than silently ignoring it. > > > > I thought about it and I'm not sure. We're not returning an error > > currently, starting returning it now might be perceived as uAPI > > breakage. > > > > But given it doesn't work at all currently, there are apparently no > > users yet. I'll wait for more feedback. > > As a user, I would probably favour receiving an error for a configuration > that can't possibly work and was not working before.
Okay, I'll change this in v2. Thanks, Pravin and Thomas. Jiri
