On 04/22/16 at 11:20pm, Jiri Benc wrote: > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:04:48 -0700, pravin shelar wrote: > > I think we should we return error in case of such configuration rather > > than silently ignoring it. > > I thought about it and I'm not sure. We're not returning an error > currently, starting returning it now might be perceived as uAPI > breakage. > > But given it doesn't work at all currently, there are apparently no > users yet. I'll wait for more feedback.
As a user, I would probably favour receiving an error for a configuration that can't possibly work and was not working before.
