On Fri, 2006-07-04 at 18:11 -0700, David S. Miller wrote:

> 
> There is actually a desire to move this stuff out of the kernel, especially
> now that we have klibc and the like which is a more appropriate place for
> things like dhcp, rarp, and bootp.
> 

Makes a lot of sense.

> So what it comes down to is in which plane the configuration of these
> types of addresses explicitly occur.  If userspace does this and
> intentionally knows that it is configuring that type of address, then
> yes the app should set the attributes correctly.
> 
> That seems to be what you are suggesting.

Indeed. 
I think that the broadcast ARP is still valid for any address configured
as a link local addresses to be done in the kernel - for those reasons
described in the RFC (which i didnt find very convincing, but other
people felt strongly about and not having them implies not meeting the
requirement).

cheers,
jamal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to