On Thu, 2005-10-11 at 20:01 +0100, Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > Stefan Rompf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > fib_disable_ip() evicts all routes pointing to that interface, including > > userspace generated ones, doesn't it? If so, we don't get away that easy. > > Right. I'm no longer sure we should remove the direct route. It would be > crazy if we remove direct route but leave, say, default one. >
well, the kernel doesnt add default routes - some admin or daemon does. So whatever solution it is should not delete such routes either. > Seems inactive routes are really the way to go. But it should behave > as active in every aspect except being ignored for actual routing > (i.e., indistinguishable from userspace, normally added and removed). but what is this "inactive" thing? cheers, jamal - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
